阅读理解10.0分
英语

Most of us spend our lives seeking the natural world. To this end, we walk the dog, play golf, go fishing, sit in the garden, drink outside rather than inside the pub, have a picnic, live in the suburbs, go to the seaside, buy a weekend place in the country. The most popular free time activity in Britain is going for a walk. And when joggers jog, they don’t run the streets. Every one of them automatically heads to the park or the river. It is my firm belief that not only do we all need nature, but we all seek nature, whether we know we are doing so or not.

But despite this, our children are growing up nature-deprived (丧失). I spent my boyhood climbing trees. These days, children are robbed of these ancient freedoms, due to problems like crime, traffic, the loss of the open spaces and strange new ideas about what is best for children, that is to say, things that can be bought, rather than things that can be found.

The truth is to be found elsewhere. A study in the US: families had moved to better housing and the children were assessed for ADHD (多动症). Those whose housing had more natural views showed an improvement of 19%; those who had the same improvement in material surroundings but no nice view improved just 4%.

A study in Sweden indicated that kindergarten children who could play in a natural environment had less illness and greater physical ability than children used only to a normal playground. A US study suggested that when a school gave children access to a natural environment, the entire school would do better in studies.

Another study found that children play differently in a natural environment. In playgrounds, children create a hierarchy (等级) based on physical abilities, with the tough ones taking the lead. But when a grassy area was planted with bushes, the children got much more into fantasy play, and the social hierarchy was now based on imagination and creativity.

Most bullying (恃强凌弱) is found in schools where there is a tarmac (柏油碎石) playground; the least bullying is in a natural area that the children are encouraged to explore. This reminds me unpleasantly of Sunnyhill School, with its hard tarmac, where I used to hang about in corners dreaming about wildlife.

But children are frequently discouraged from involvement with natural spaces, for health and safety reasons, for fear that they might get dirty or that they might cause damage. So, instead, the damage is done to the children themselves: not to their bodies but to their souls.

One of the great problems of modern childhood is ADHD, now increasingly and expensively treated with drugs. Yet one study after another indicates that contact with nature gives huge benefits to ADHD children. However, we spend money on drugs rather than on green places.

The life of old people is much better when they have access to nature. The most important for the growing population of old people is in quality rather than quantity of years. And study after study finds that a garden is the single most important thing in finding that quality.

In wider and more difficult areas of life, there is evidence to indicate that natural surroundings improve all kinds of things. Even problems with crime and aggressive behaviour are reduced when there is contact with the natural world.

Dr William Bird, researcher from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, states in his study, “A natural environment can reduce violent behaviour because its process helps reduce anger and behavior that people might regret later.” Wild places need encouraging for this reason, no matter how small their contribution.

We tend to think human beings are doing nature some kind of favour when we are protecting nature. The error here is far too deep: not only do humans need nature for themselves, but the very idea that humanity and the natural world are separable things is damaging.

Human beings are a species of animals. For seven million years we lived on the planet as part of nature. So we miss the natural world and long for contact with non-human life. Anyone who has patted a dog, stroked a cat, sat under a tree with a glass of beer, given or received a bunch of flowers or chosen to walk through the park on a nice day, understands that.

We need the wild world. It is necessary to our well-being, our health, our happiness. Without other living things around us we are less than human.

41.What is the author’s firm belief?

42.What does a study in Sweden show?

A. The natural environment can help children learn better.

B. More access to nature makes children less likely to fall ill.

C. A good playground helps kids develop their physical abilities.

D. Natural views can prevent children from developing ADHD.



43. Children who have chances to explore natural areas ________.

A. tend to develop a strong love for science



44. What does the author suggest we do to help children with ADHD?

A. Find more effective drugs for them.

45. In what way do elderly people benefit from their contact with nature?

A. They look on life optimistically.

第1小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

A

解析

确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。B人们应该在野外度过他们余生C人们有不同的想法 D人们必须作出更大的努力研究自然,所以选择A。

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解题。根据第一段的“To this end, we walk the dog, play golf, go fishing, sit in the garden, drink outside rather than inside the pub, have a picnic, live in the suburbs, go to the seaside.”可知,为此,我们遛狗,打高尔夫,钓鱼,坐在花园里,在外面喝酒(不是酒馆),举行野餐,住在郊区,去海边,在乡下买一个周末的地方。所以选择A。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第2小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

B

解析

确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。A自然环境可以帮助孩子更好的学习。C操场可以帮助孩子发展自己的体能。 D自然可以防止孩子们发展多动症,所以选择B。

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解题。根据第四段的“A study in Sweden indicated that kindergarten children who could play in a natural environment had less illness and greater physical ability than children used only to a normal playground.”可知,在瑞典的一项研究表明,幼儿园的孩子可以在自然环境中少生病和在体能上也要比在游乐场的孩子好。所以选择B。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第3小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

B

解析

确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。A可以发展对自然强烈的爱。B 有可能梦到野生动物。 C趋向于在成年后身体的使用应性更严格,所以选择D

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解题。根据第六段的“; the least bullying is in a natural area that the children are encouraged to explore.”可知,在自然环境中,孩子被鼓励去探索,。所以选择D。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第4小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

A

解析

确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。A为他们找到更有效的药物。C给孩子们更多的个人护理。 D鼓励孩子们参与有意义的活动,所以选择B

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解题。根据第六段的“Yet one study after another indicates that contact with nature gives huge benefits to ADHD children”可知,现在越来越多的孩子已开始接受贵重的药物治疗。然而,一个又一个的研究表明,与自然接触给多动症儿童巨大的好处。所以选择B。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。

第5小题正确答案及相关解析

正确答案

A

解析

确定题目关键词,在文章中找到对应部分,回到题目逐一对照。

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。A他们看起来生活乐观。C他们可以活的更长。 D他们变得愉快。所以选择B

考查方向

本题考查了学生提取细节能力。

解题思路

事实细节题,直接信息理解题。根据第七段的“The life of old people is much better when they have access to nature. …that a garden is the single most important thing in finding that quality”可知,从自然中老人可以获得更多。老年人的人口增长的最重要的是质量而不是数量。研究发现,花园可以为老人提升生活的质量。所以选择B。

易错点

把握不住细节信息。