Skin-to-skin Effort Aims to Cut Newborn Deaths
There are 16 million babies born in China each year, and approximately 150,000 of them die before they reach one month of age. 71 Zhang Shuyi, a researcher at the Capital Institute of Pediatrics in Beijing, said there was strong evidence for the First Embrace approach.
“When babies are cold, they are more likely to catch infections or have difficulty breathing,” she said,” 72 It provides direct protection against infection, promotes bonding between the parent and child and supports breast-feeding.” Health workers who shifted from the normal practice of separation to skin-to-skin contact have observed that babies are more pink, calm and comfortable.
The WHO has developed the First Embrace approach to help reduce newborn deaths across the Western Pacific region, including China. Bernhard Schwartlander , the WHO Representative in China, said, “As many as two-thirds of newborn deaths could be prevented using simple, low-cost methods, including the First Embrace.”
73 The WHO will be posting information about the campaign, and hosting online question-and-answer sessions with Chinese and international experts. The public can participate by following the WHO on Weibo and joining the conversation. Schwartlander said, “We are targeting new parents, pregnant women and couples thinking about having a baby. 74 ”
Just last month, a new research shows that child and mother health outcomes in Shanghai are equal to those in the USA and Canada. 75 Hopefully, the messages conveyed by the new campaign could help to bridge that gap.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
B
前文有明确的数字,表明新生婴儿死亡率;而B项中thatnumber恰是指向这一数据。
细节理解
联系上下文
抓不住要点
容易
C
后文有写it可抗感染,促进母子之间的联系。以及后文中的对比描述,可见it代指前文的应该是一件好的方式,C项中的skin-to-skin保持婴儿温暖非常符合。
细节理解
联系上下文
抓不住要点
容易
A
后文中的online表明该项运动登上网络了,再下面一句话中直接出现Weibo,同词复现,选择A。
细节理解
联系上下文
抓不住要点
难度适中
G
与前文人称一致,都是we开头;含义上也是一脉相承,表明该组织的服务人群和服务宗旨。此题易选错D。因为前文提到各类parents,D项以thoseparents开头。但要注意thoseparent的定语从句与前文相悖。
细节理解
联系上下文
抓不住要点
难度适中
E
因为后文中有bridgethat gap,那么填空处与前文就要形成一个gap。那么即选表转折含义的E项。该项可能部分同学会迷惑选择F项,但要注意F项不仅没形成后文提到的gap,而且句意上也不符合。前文说的是一个equal,而F项却说了一个improved。
细节理解
联系上下文
抓不住要点
难度适中